Team Mobile Plans

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 26 November 2013

In-ear vs. on-ear, circumaural vs. supraaural, open vs. closed back -- shopping for the right pair of headphones can be tough, but CNET's on the job with a buying guide to help you narrow down your choices. Harman/Kardon Classic headphones (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) A long, long time ago, before the Age of the Walkman came along and revolutionized the devices in the 1980s, headphones were big and clunky. In those bygone days, headphones were stay-at-home things, relegated to late-night, LP music listening. That was then; the latest generation of slimmed-down headphones injects high-resolution music or home-theater sound directly into your ears. Audio-Technica's ATH-M50s are among the best over-ear headphones for less than $200, but definitely check out the Bose QuietComfort 3 if powered noise-cancellation is at the top of your features list. On the other hand, if you're shopping on a budget and just want new headphone that sounds better than the ones that came with your music player, the Koss Porta Pros continue to earn a spot on our Top 5 list for their throwback design and worthy sonic competition, even after 28 years. Not everyone feels comfortable with the headband-style designs of circumaural headphones, so earbud-lovers will want to check out the Klipsch Image S4i II, a well-balanced headphone that comes with a tangle-resistant flat cord and three sets of oval ear tips to achieve that all-important precision fit. Still unsatisfied? There are plenty more options in our list of the best headphones. Forms and styles The distinctions of portable and home headphones are melting away, but the following rundown of headphone types will clarify your buying options. How you intend to use your headphones -- for music, home theater, or gaming -- and where you plan to do your listening -- at home or on the go -- will narrow the range of possible types you'll want to research. The four major form factors are listed below, from the smallest (or most portable) to the largest, which are the least portable. 1. Earbud headphones Also known as: In-ear headphones. Panasonic ErgoFit RP-HJE120 earbud headphones (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Earbuds are commonly issued as freebie headphones with portable players and usually get junked in favor of higher-performance buds that offer sonics rivaling full-size models. Their tiny earpieces rest on the outer ear or need to be inserted into the ear canal, and some models include clips for a more tailored, secure fit. Upside: Ultracompact and lightweight; most models have microphone and track navigation controls built into the wire; can provide moderate to excellent isolation from external noise; little to no interference with earrings, glasses, hats, or hairstyles. Downside: Sound quality and bass response often not comparable with full-size models; can sometimes cause discomfort over extended use; some reference models are difficult to insert and remove, making them less than ideal for office environments; dual-cable design means more possibilities for tangled wire. Extra features: Five-button remote to control volume; variety of ear tip sizes and materials (foam, rubber, silicone); over-ear guides; multiple balanced-armature drivers with crossover. See all earbud headphone reviews here. 2. On-ear headphones Also known as: Supra-aural headphones, open-backed headphones, semi-open headphones, closed-back headphones, earpad headphones. Grado Labs Prestige SR80i (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) These headphones rest on top of your outer ears and run the gamut from inexpensive portables to high-end home models. While on-ear headphones can have closed designs that cover the ears, some prefer fully sealed circumaural models (see below) for their increased sound isolation and the fact that they won't leak sound to neighbors. Still, the earpad headphone is preferred in places like office environments, where users still benefit from hearing the outside world. Upside: Comfortable; less prone to overheating ears than full-size headphones; some models fold up for easy transport. Downside: Less effective noise isolation than in-ear or full-size models; less powerful bass compared with full-size headphones; leaks noise to neighbors. Extra features: Microphone and track navigation controls on the wire; extra earpad set included; carrying case; folding design; coiled and straight cord. See all on-ear headphone reviews here. 3. Full-size headphones Also known as: Circumaural headphones; closed-back headphones; earcup headphones; over-the-ear headphones.. Monster Inspiration headphones (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) The tech-speak description for this type of headphone is "circumaural," which includes any headphones with earcups that fully enclose your ears. Because of their size and their acoustic isolation, full-size headphones are often considered to be better suited to home use rather than as a portable option, but the recent popularity of Monster's full-size, noise-canceling Beats headphones are challenging the rule. Upside: Large headphones offer potential for maximum bass and loudness levels; earcups create larger sound stage; surround-sound effectively blocks outside noises, seals music in. Downside: Large footprint can be cumbersome for portable use; some full-size models have problems with heat on the ears; wide headband can often interfere with earrings, glasses, and some hairstyles. Extra features: Folding design; detachable cord; microphone, track navigation, and volume controls on the wire; replaceable pads; extra 3.5mm plug for daisy-chain sessions with multiple listeners. See all full-size headphone reviews here. 4. Wireless headphones Also known as: Bluetooth headphones, transmitter headphones. Sennheiser RS 220 Wireless Hi-fi Headphones (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Wireless headphones are most commonly used (A) in apartments with thin walls that don't permit loud media from bookshelf speakers, and (B) on the run where a dangling cord can get in the way. The most popular format for transmitting wireless music is Bluetooth, but keep in mind that you'll sacrifice sound quality to convenience in the file compression process. To combat this audio degradation, some of the newer headphones support the aptX Bluetooth codec that offers slightly improved fidelity. Upside: No messy wires to trip you up; falling prices make Bluetooth headphones a reasonable auxiliary device for workouts and portable use. Downside: The music stops when your battery dies; compressed audio files will leave your music sounding less dynamic; less real estate on the headphones means smaller buttons to control track navigation and volume; hardware limitations relegate its use to devices with Bluetooth connectivity. Extras: Active noise-cancellation; 3.5mm port, and cable for a hardwired connection; replaceable earpads; travel case. See all wireless headphone reviews here. 5. Noise-canceling headphones AKG K495 NC Acoustics (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) These headphones hush ambient noise by creating antinoise that obviates the noise at your ear. They don't eliminate the outside world, but the better models significantly reduce the whoosh of airplanes' air-conditioning systems. Noise-canceling headphones come in all forms, from full-size to earbuds. Since you no longer have to crank up the volume to overcome background noise, this type of headphone lets you listen at lower levels, which leads to reduced ear fatigue. You'll also hear more low-level detail in your music. Upside: Active noise-canceling technology eliminates ambient noise; ideal for plane rides and morning commutes. Downside: Alters the "natural" qualities of music; some people experience an "underwater" nausea effect from the noise-canceling hum. Extras: Wireless connection; travel case; rechargeable batteries; on-ear navigation and volume controls. See all noise-canceling headphone reviews here. Features The size, type, and technology of a pair of headphones are all critical to a purchasing decision. But it's important to demystify the bevy of features and headphone-specific vocabulary. Listed below are the most important features you'll need to consider before finding the perfect pair of headphones. Bass: Even at its very best, headphone bass is never the sort of pants-flapping, sock-it-to-your-gut experience you literally feel from massive speakers or subwoofers, but many manufacturers (like the Beats by Dr. Dre) custom tune their "signature sound" to emphasize the lower frequencies, albeit at the cost of instrument separation and natural delivery. Soul by Ludacris SL300 (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Earbuds are tiny and portable, but -- except for a couple of high-end models -- they can't compete with full-size, over-the-ear headphones for deep bass response or visceral dynamic range. Sealed vs. open: Sealed headphones -- the noise-isolating, in-ear models or the full-size earcup designs -- acoustically isolate your ears from your environment. Of course, the degree of isolation varies from one pair of headphones to another, and the seal limits the leakage of the headphones' sound out to the room. Sealed models are ideal for private listening, where you don't want the sound to be heard by other people. Open headphones -- such as foam earpad models and many sports designs -- are acoustically transparent and allow outside sound to be heard by the headphone wearer, and a good deal of the headphones' sound will be audible to anyone near the listener. Generally speaking, such headphones produce better, more "open" sound than sealed designs. Because they don't block out everything from the outside world, open-backed headphones are recommended for outdoor activities, such as jogging, which require awareness of your environment. Comfort and weight: Assessing sound quality is always a subjective exercise, but the only way to judge comfort is to put them on and listen for at least 10 minutes. Do the earpads exert too much pressure on your ears? Headphones that enclose or cover your ears can get uncomfortably hot, but you'll have to wear them for a while to find out. Some of the bigger sealed models with cushy leatherette pads are the worst offenders. Pro-style headphones are comparatively bulky and can feel uncomfortably heavy after hours of use. Lighter headband-style headphones are almost always more comfortable than heavier ones. And even if they're not, they're less of a hassle to carry around. Durability: There's no reason a headphone should be treated as disposable technology. Unlike almost everything else in the realm of consumer electronics, this year's headphones won't be obsolete six months or a year from now. In fact, there's no reason a good pair of headphones can't last for the better part of a decade. Be sure to assess the build quality of your prospective headphones. Some earbuds and portable devices are relatively fragile, for instance. If the headphones fold up for easy storage, are the hinges robust, or will they fall apart in a month or two? Don't forge to consider that the earpads and earbuds will get extensive wear and tear over the life of the headphones. Cable dressing and length: Most stereo headphones have just one cable, usually attached to the left earpiece (sometimes called single-sided cabling). Some models -- and all earbuds -- use a Y-cable that connects to both earpieces (double-sided). The actual cable plug, meanwhile, is usually one of two designs: a straight I-plug or an angled L-plug; the latter may be useful if your portable player has a side- or bottom-mounted headphone jack. Harman/Kardon Classic (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Preferences for the length of headphone cables vary for portable users, especially depending on where you prefer to wear your device: a backpack or a pants pocket necessitates a longer cable, while you'll opt for a short one when wearing a player on a neck lavalier or an armband. But a cable length at either extreme need not be a fatal flaw: extension cables can lengthen those that are too short, and cable wraps can tighten up ones that are too long. Quick reference glossary You'll find a few of the following specifications on the headphones' box or on the manufacturer's Web site. Here's what they mean: Frequency response : Frequency-response specifications in full-size loudspeakers are generally pretty useless in predicting sound quality, but headphone frequency-response numbers are even worse. Manufacturers have routinely exaggerated frequency-response figures to the point that they're irrelevant. Even the flimsiest, cheap headphones routinely boast extremely low bass-response performance --15Hz or 20Hz -- but almost always sound lightweight and bright. Generally, bass buffs will be happier sticking with larger 'phones. Total harmonic distortion: True, headphones with lower actual total harmonic distortion (THD) will sound better than those with higher THD. But the quoted THD numbers -- "less than 1 percent" -- aren't helpful in predicting sound quality. Listen to recordings of simply recorded acoustic guitar to assess the distortion of one set of headphones versus another. Some will sound appreciably cleaner than others. Impedance: Generally speaking, the lower the headphones' electrical impedance (aka resistance), the easier it is to get higher volume. But here again, the low impedance is no guarantee of high volume capability; other factors can still limit loudness potential. Since many MP3 players have feeble power output -- the iPod is a notable exception -- smart shoppers should check the loudness before purchasing any pair of headphones. To be sure, listen with your player. Frequently asked questions Q: Do I need a headphone amplifier? A: What you plug your headphones into can significantly affect their sound, and the quality of the amplifiers built into portable CD/MP3 players is generally awful. It's not their fault: the little guys have to power their electronics and their internal amplifier using a few puny volts. Even some of the better home AV receivers' headphone jacks offer highly variable sound quality. (Credit: Steve Guttenberg/CNET) If you find yourself listening to headphones a lot of the time and care about sound quality, you might want to consider purchasing a headphone amp. Both home and portable headphone amplifiers are available, and Steve Guttenberg reviews them all the time on his high-end audio blog on CNET, The Audiophiliac. Q: I lost the ear tips that came with my earbuds, do I have to buy a whole new pair of headphones? A: Absolutely not...unless you're just looking for an excuse to try something new. But if you're not made of money, you can always hit up the manufacturer for a pair of replacement tips. Most earbuds only come with one set of each size, so losing one can be annoying. If you're in an experimental mood, Comply offers aftermarket tips that fit your brand and come in a variety of materials. Q: Does a higher price tag mean the headphones will sound better? A: Not necessarily. We're continually surprised that people drop hundreds of dollars on a smartphone and still refuse to invest in a quality pair of headphones to use with it. On the other hand, not all inexpensive headphones should be assumed to be cheap. Case in point: the Koss PortaPro headphones first hit the market in 1984 and have become such a favorite with audiophiles that the company leaves the design (and the price tag) untouched. You can still pick one up for less than $50, and they come with a lifetime warranty, no receipt necessary. Check out our favorite budget headphones for more selections. Ready to go shopping? Head over to the CNET Headphones page to get started.

Posted on 16:17 by Unknown

In-ear vs. on-ear, circumaural vs. supraaural, open vs. closed back -- shopping for the right pair of headphones can be tough, but CNET's on the job with a buying guide to help you narrow down your choices.




Harman/Kardon Classic headphones


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

A long, long time ago, before the Age of the Walkman came along and revolutionized the devices in the 1980s, headphones were big and clunky. In those bygone days, headphones were stay-at-home things, relegated to late-night, LP music listening. That was then; the latest generation of slimmed-down headphones injects high-resolution music or home-theater sound directly into your ears.


Audio-Technica's ATH-M50s are among the best over-ear headphones for less than $200, but definitely check out the Bose QuietComfort 3 if powered noise-cancellation is at the top of your features list. On the other hand, if you're shopping on a budget and just want new headphone that sounds better than the ones that came with your music player, the Koss Porta Pros continue to earn a spot on our Top 5 list for their throwback design and worthy sonic competition, even after 28 years. Not everyone feels comfortable with the headband-style designs of circumaural headphones, so earbud-lovers will want to check out the Klipsch Image S4i II, a well-balanced headphone that comes with a tangle-resistant flat cord and three sets of oval ear tips to achieve that all-important precision fit.


Still unsatisfied? There are plenty more options in our list of the best headphones.


Forms and styles


The distinctions of portable and home headphones are melting away, but the following rundown of headphone types will clarify your buying options. How you intend to use your headphones -- for music, home theater, or gaming -- and where you plan to do your listening -- at home or on the go -- will narrow the range of possible types you'll want to research. The four major form factors are listed below, from the smallest (or most portable) to the largest, which are the least portable.


1. Earbud headphones


Also known as: In-ear headphones.



Panasonic ErgoFit RP-HJE120 earbud headphones


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

Earbuds are commonly issued as freebie headphones with portable players and usually get junked in favor of higher-performance buds that offer sonics rivaling full-size models. Their tiny earpieces rest on the outer ear or need to be inserted into the ear canal, and some models include clips for a more tailored, secure fit.


Upside: Ultracompact and lightweight; most models have microphone and track navigation controls built into the wire; can provide moderate to excellent isolation from external noise; little to no interference with earrings, glasses, hats, or hairstyles.


Downside: Sound quality and bass response often not comparable with full-size models; can sometimes cause discomfort over extended use; some reference models are difficult to insert and remove, making them less than ideal for office environments; dual-cable design means more possibilities for tangled wire.


Extra features: Five-button remote to control volume; variety of ear tip sizes and materials (foam, rubber, silicone); over-ear guides; multiple balanced-armature drivers with crossover.


See all earbud headphone reviews here.


2. On-ear headphones


Also known as: Supra-aural headphones, open-backed headphones, semi-open headphones, closed-back headphones, earpad headphones.



Grado Labs Prestige SR80i


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

These headphones rest on top of your outer ears and run the gamut from inexpensive portables to high-end home models. While on-ear headphones can have closed designs that cover the ears, some prefer fully sealed circumaural models (see below) for their increased sound isolation and the fact that they won't leak sound to neighbors. Still, the earpad headphone is preferred in places like office environments, where users still benefit from hearing the outside world.


Upside: Comfortable; less prone to overheating ears than full-size headphones; some models fold up for easy transport.


Downside: Less effective noise isolation than in-ear or full-size models; less powerful bass compared with full-size headphones; leaks noise to neighbors.


Extra features: Microphone and track navigation controls on the wire; extra earpad set included; carrying case; folding design; coiled and straight cord.


See all on-ear headphone reviews here.


3. Full-size headphones


Also known as: Circumaural headphones; closed-back headphones; earcup headphones; over-the-ear headphones..



Monster Inspiration headphones


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

The tech-speak description for this type of headphone is "circumaural," which includes any headphones with earcups that fully enclose your ears. Because of their size and their acoustic isolation, full-size headphones are often considered to be better suited to home use rather than as a portable option, but the recent popularity of Monster's full-size, noise-canceling Beats headphones are challenging the rule.


Upside: Large headphones offer potential for maximum bass and loudness levels; earcups create larger sound stage; surround-sound effectively blocks outside noises, seals music in.


Downside: Large footprint can be cumbersome for portable use; some full-size models have problems with heat on the ears; wide headband can often interfere with earrings, glasses, and some hairstyles.


Extra features: Folding design; detachable cord; microphone, track navigation, and volume controls on the wire; replaceable pads; extra 3.5mm plug for daisy-chain sessions with multiple listeners.


See all full-size headphone reviews here.


4. Wireless headphones


Also known as: Bluetooth headphones, transmitter headphones.



Sennheiser RS 220 Wireless Hi-fi Headphones


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

Wireless headphones are most commonly used (A) in apartments with thin walls that don't permit loud media from bookshelf speakers, and (B) on the run where a dangling cord can get in the way. The most popular format for transmitting wireless music is Bluetooth, but keep in mind that you'll sacrifice sound quality to convenience in the file compression process. To combat this audio degradation, some of the newer headphones support the aptX Bluetooth codec that offers slightly improved fidelity.


Upside: No messy wires to trip you up; falling prices make Bluetooth headphones a reasonable auxiliary device for workouts and portable use.


Downside: The music stops when your battery dies; compressed audio files will leave your music sounding less dynamic; less real estate on the headphones means smaller buttons to control track navigation and volume; hardware limitations relegate its use to devices with Bluetooth connectivity.


Extras: Active noise-cancellation; 3.5mm port, and cable for a hardwired connection; replaceable earpads; travel case.


See all wireless headphone reviews here.


5. Noise-canceling headphones



AKG K495 NC Acoustics


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

These headphones hush ambient noise by creating antinoise that obviates the noise at your ear. They don't eliminate the outside world, but the better models significantly reduce the whoosh of airplanes' air-conditioning systems. Noise-canceling headphones come in all forms, from full-size to earbuds. Since you no longer have to crank up the volume to overcome background noise, this type of headphone lets you listen at lower levels, which leads to reduced ear fatigue. You'll also hear more low-level detail in your music.


Upside: Active noise-canceling technology eliminates ambient noise; ideal for plane rides and morning commutes.


Downside: Alters the "natural" qualities of music; some people experience an "underwater" nausea effect from the noise-canceling hum.


Extras: Wireless connection; travel case; rechargeable batteries; on-ear navigation and volume controls.


See all noise-canceling headphone reviews here.


Features


The size, type, and technology of a pair of headphones are all critical to a purchasing decision. But it's important to demystify the bevy of features and headphone-specific vocabulary. Listed below are the most important features you'll need to consider before finding the perfect pair of headphones.



  • Bass: Even at its very best, headphone bass is never the sort of pants-flapping, sock-it-to-your-gut experience you literally feel from massive speakers or subwoofers, but many manufacturers (like the Beats by Dr. Dre) custom tune their "signature sound" to emphasize the lower frequencies, albeit at the cost of instrument separation and natural delivery.

    Soul by Ludacris SL300


    (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

    Earbuds are tiny and portable, but -- except for a couple of high-end models -- they can't compete with full-size, over-the-ear headphones for deep bass response or visceral dynamic range.



  • Sealed vs. open: Sealed headphones -- the noise-isolating, in-ear models or the full-size earcup designs -- acoustically isolate your ears from your environment. Of course, the degree of isolation varies from one pair of headphones to another, and the seal limits the leakage of the headphones' sound out to the room.

    Sealed models are ideal for private listening, where you don't want the sound to be heard by other people. Open headphones -- such as foam earpad models and many sports designs -- are acoustically transparent and allow outside sound to be heard by the headphone wearer, and a good deal of the headphones' sound will be audible to anyone near the listener.


    Generally speaking, such headphones produce better, more "open" sound than sealed designs. Because they don't block out everything from the outside world, open-backed headphones are recommended for outdoor activities, such as jogging, which require awareness of your environment.



  • Comfort and weight: Assessing sound quality is always a subjective exercise, but the only way to judge comfort is to put them on and listen for at least 10 minutes.

    Do the earpads exert too much pressure on your ears? Headphones that enclose or cover your ears can get uncomfortably hot, but you'll have to wear them for a while to find out. Some of the bigger sealed models with cushy leatherette pads are the worst offenders.


    Pro-style headphones are comparatively bulky and can feel uncomfortably heavy after hours of use. Lighter headband-style headphones are almost always more comfortable than heavier ones. And even if they're not, they're less of a hassle to carry around.



  • Durability: There's no reason a headphone should be treated as disposable technology. Unlike almost everything else in the realm of consumer electronics, this year's headphones won't be obsolete six months or a year from now. In fact, there's no reason a good pair of headphones can't last for the better part of a decade.

    Be sure to assess the build quality of your prospective headphones. Some earbuds and portable devices are relatively fragile, for instance. If the headphones fold up for easy storage, are the hinges robust, or will they fall apart in a month or two? Don't forge to consider that the earpads and earbuds will get extensive wear and tear over the life of the headphones.



  • Cable dressing and length: Most stereo headphones have just one cable, usually attached to the left earpiece (sometimes called single-sided cabling). Some models -- and all earbuds -- use a Y-cable that connects to both earpieces (double-sided). The actual cable plug, meanwhile, is usually one of two designs: a straight I-plug or an angled L-plug; the latter may be useful if your portable player has a side- or bottom-mounted headphone jack.



Harman/Kardon Classic


(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

Preferences for the length of headphone cables vary for portable users, especially depending on where you prefer to wear your device: a backpack or a pants pocket necessitates a longer cable, while you'll opt for a short one when wearing a player on a neck lavalier or an armband. But a cable length at either extreme need not be a fatal flaw: extension cables can lengthen those that are too short, and cable wraps can tighten up ones that are too long.



Quick reference glossary


You'll find a few of the following specifications on the headphones' box or on the manufacturer's Web site. Here's what they mean:


Frequency response : Frequency-response specifications in full-size loudspeakers are generally pretty useless in predicting sound quality, but headphone frequency-response numbers are even worse. Manufacturers have routinely exaggerated frequency-response figures to the point that they're irrelevant. Even the flimsiest, cheap headphones routinely boast extremely low bass-response performance --15Hz or 20Hz -- but almost always sound lightweight and bright. Generally, bass buffs will be happier sticking with larger 'phones.


Total harmonic distortion: True, headphones with lower actual total harmonic distortion (THD) will sound better than those with higher THD. But the quoted THD numbers -- "less than 1 percent" -- aren't helpful in predicting sound quality. Listen to recordings of simply recorded acoustic guitar to assess the distortion of one set of headphones versus another. Some will sound appreciably cleaner than others.


Impedance: Generally speaking, the lower the headphones' electrical impedance (aka resistance), the easier it is to get higher volume. But here again, the low impedance is no guarantee of high volume capability; other factors can still limit loudness potential. Since many MP3 players have feeble power output -- the iPod is a notable exception -- smart shoppers should check the loudness before purchasing any pair of headphones. To be sure, listen with your player.



Frequently asked questions


Q: Do I need a headphone amplifier?


A: What you plug your headphones into can significantly affect their sound, and the quality of the amplifiers built into portable CD/MP3 players is generally awful. It's not their fault: the little guys have to power their electronics and their internal amplifier using a few puny volts. Even some of the better home AV receivers' headphone jacks offer highly variable sound quality.


(Credit: Steve Guttenberg/CNET)

If you find yourself listening to headphones a lot of the time and care about sound quality, you might want to consider purchasing a headphone amp. Both home and portable headphone amplifiers are available, and Steve Guttenberg reviews them all the time on his high-end audio blog on CNET, The Audiophiliac.


Q: I lost the ear tips that came with my earbuds, do I have to buy a whole new pair of headphones?


A: Absolutely not...unless you're just looking for an excuse to try something new. But if you're not made of money, you can always hit up the manufacturer for a pair of replacement tips. Most earbuds only come with one set of each size, so losing one can be annoying. If you're in an experimental mood, Comply offers aftermarket tips that fit your brand and come in a variety of materials.


Q: Does a higher price tag mean the headphones will sound better?


A: Not necessarily. We're continually surprised that people drop hundreds of dollars on a smartphone and still refuse to invest in a quality pair of headphones to use with it. On the other hand, not all inexpensive headphones should be assumed to be cheap.


Case in point: the Koss PortaPro headphones first hit the market in 1984 and have become such a favorite with audiophiles that the company leaves the design (and the price tag) untouched. You can still pick one up for less than $50, and they come with a lifetime warranty, no receipt necessary. Check out our favorite budget headphones for more selections.


Ready to go shopping? Head over to the CNET Headphones page to get started.



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The mobile processor giant also unveiled its fourth-generation 4G LTE processor with "significant" improvements in performance and power consumption. November 20, 2013 4:30 AM PST Qualcomm CEO Paul Jacobs talks mobility during his keynote at 2013 CES. (Credit: James Martin/CNET) Qualcomm on Wednesday unveiled several new processors designed to widen its lead in the mobile market. The first, the Snapdragon 805, is geared at mobile devices and 4K, Ultra HD TVs. The chip is part of the company's high-end mobile chip line and was designed to "deliver the highest-quality mobile video, imaging, and graphics experiences." Qualcomm noted it's the company's highest-performing chip so far. Another, the Gobi 9x35 is Qualcomm's fourth-generation 4G LTE modem. Along with LTE, the chip also runs 3G and other wireless technologies. Qualcomm also announced a new RF transceiver chip, the WTR3925. The company noted that both chips offer "significant improvements in performance, power consumption, and printed circuit board area requirements." The Gobi 9x35 is Qualcomm's first cellular modem created at 20 nanometers, or billionths of a meter. Its smaller size will allow for thinner and lighter devices. "Using a smartphone or tablet powered by Snapdragon 805 processor is like having an UltraHD home theater in your pocket, with 4K video, imaging, and graphics, all built for mobile," Murthy Renduchintala, executive vice president of Qualcomm Technologies, said in a press release. "Coupled with our industry leading Gobi LTE modems and RF transceivers, streaming and watching content at 4K resolution will finally be possible." Qualcomm provides applications processors that serve as the brains of electronics, and it leads the market for providing chips that allow mobile devices to connect to wireless networks. Its 4G LTE processors in particular have been gaining strong traction of late and are used in gadgets like the iPhone 5S. However, competition in 4G LTE is expected to increase as rival products hit the market from companies such as Intel. Hands-on with the curvy LG G Flex phone (pictures) 1-2 of 12 Scroll Left Scroll Right Qualcomm first unveiled its Snapdragon 800 and 600 lines at the Consumer Electronics Show in January. Since that time, many devices have shipped with the processors, including the LG G2 smartphone and the Google Nexus 5 phone. The Snapdragon 805 features Qualcomm's new Adreno 420 graphics processor, with up to 40 percent more graphics processing power than its predecessor. The company said it's the first mobile processor to offer system-level 4K/Ultra HD support, 4K video capture and playback, and enhanced dual camera image signal processors for better performance, multitasking, and power efficiency. The chip has four cores and runs at speeds of up to 2.5 GHz per core. It's able to stream more video content at higher quality using less power, Qualcomm said, and it allows for sharper, higher resolution photos in low light and advanced post-processing features. Customers currently are sampling the Snapdragon 805. It will be in devices in the first half of next year.
    The mobile processor giant also unveiled its fourth-generation 4G LTE processor with "significant" improvements in performance and...
  • The company has replaced its CFO, COO, and CMO as it attempts to reinvigorate its ailing operation. November 25, 2013 6:14 AM PST BlackBerry has made several major changes at its executive level. The company on Monday announced that its chief operating officer Kristian Tear and chief marketing officer Frank Boulben are leaving BlackBerry. The company's chief financial officer Brian Bidulka is also out, but will stay on as a special advisory to CEO John Chen through the end of the company's fiscal year. BlackBerry's controller James Yersh will take over as CFO. The announcement is just the latest bloodletting at BlackBerry, as the company tries to reestablish itself an increasingly competitive mobile market. Earlier this month, BlackBerry announced that a deal that would have seen the company acquired by Fairfax Financial was dead. Thorsten Heins, the company's chief executive at the time, was fired. John Chen replaced Heins as chief executive and BlackBerry announced plans to raise $1 billion through a sale of convertible notes to investors. In a statement on Monday, Chen thanked the outgoing executives for their service to BlackBerry, adding that the moves are designed to align his "senior management team and organizational structure." In addition to losing some executives, BlackBerry said on Monday that Roger Martin, a board member since 2007, has resigned.
    The company has replaced its CFO, COO, and CMO as it attempts to reinvigorate its ailing operation. November 25, 2013 6:14 AM PST BlackBer...
  • Batkid is taking to the streets of Gotham City Friday with an assist from Batman, the superheroes at the Make-A-Wish Foundation, and hordes of his San Francisco fans. November 15, 2013 12:30 PM PST The San Francisco Chronicle in disguise. (Credit: San Francisco Chronicle) Let me introduce you to the kid behind the mask. He's 5 years old. He shows extreme bravery in the face of leukemia. His parents know him as mild-mannered, sweet Miles, but on Friday he became Batkid, his superhero alter ego. The Make-A-Wish Foundation of the Greater Bay Area and thousands of volunteers have transformed San Francisco into Gotham City for a day. Batkid has already trained with his mentor Batman, saved a damsel in distress chained to a big green detonation device covered in the Riddler's signature question marks, and helped to apprehend The Riddler. He is well on his way to receiving a key to the city from the mayor. This may be the fastest origin story in superhero history. Dressed in a custom pint-size Batsuit, his identity hidden, Batkid isn't just conquering evil, he's also trending on Twitter. He has his own Facebook fan page, live blogs are dedicated to him and his adventures, and CNET's intrepid photographer James Martin, joining many other members of the media, is live-tweeting his adventures. He's so popular, not one person has given a second thought about Ben Affleck. When Make-A-Wish put out a call for volunteers to come out to cheer Batkid on and record his exploits, the citizens of Gotham rose up to support him. More than 10,000 people RSVPed for the day's events. The crowds lining the sunny streets at Batkid's scheduled stops have been enormous. Onlookers are carrying pro-Batkid signs that say "Miles, You're my hero!" and "We love Batkid." Some even cheered the little hero on as he made his way to the restroom. Perhaps best of all, Batkid, despite his real-life battle with cancer, is managing these feats with 99 percent less angst than Christian Bale. Onward, Batkid, the citizens of Gotham need you! Batkid came to the rescue of a grateful damsel in distress. (Credit: James Martin/CNET) Run, Batkid, run! (Credit: Make-A-Wish Foundation of the Greater Bay Area)
    Batkid is taking to the streets of Gotham City Friday with an assist from Batman, the superheroes at the Make-A-Wish Foundation, and hordes ...
  • During the press preview for the Los Angeles auto show, Mini will take the covers off its completely rebuilt Mini Cooper, the mainstay of its brand. November 14, 2013 10:50 AM PST Mini released this photo of a partially uncovered Cooper after spy shots emerged. (Credit: Mini) When BMW bought Mini and launched its version of the venerable Cooper in 2001, the car was lauded for its go-kart handling and updated British style. Beyond engine and tech changes, that car remained pretty much the same for over a decade, Mini seeming to concentrate its resources on new Cooper variants, such as the Countryman and Paceman. Now Mini is set to release a fully updated Cooper hatchback, the mainstay of its brand. Beyond some technical information released by Mini and a few spy shots that have emerged, we don't know too much about the car. It will be built on a new platform, shared with parent company BMW. The spy shots show a car that looks fairly similar to the current generation, with some styling changes. The hood drop-off looks slightly more rounded towards the front and the beltline seems more prominent. The car's designers don't seem to have overly enlarged the car, so it should retain its handling character. Officially, Mini details a couple of new engine choices. The base model will get a 1.5-liter three cylinder. Given BMW's latest engine tech, that engine will probably be as powerful as the current base 2-liter. A turbocharged 2-liter four cylinder will also be available, likely in a Cooper S model. Expect that engine to be the same as BMW uses in its newer 28-designated models, which produces up to 240 horsepower and 255 pound-feet of torque. However, Mini may detune it for less output, as BMW has done with its 320i model. Mini has also announced an array of driver assistance systems for the Cooper. It will get a head-up display, which appears similar to that being offered on the new Mazda3. A rear view camera and an automatic parking system will also be on the option list. The Cooper will also get a camera-based adaptive cruise control system. The Mini Cooper will be unveiled next week at the Los Angeles auto show. Mini released this completely uninformative video about the new Cooper.
    During the press preview for the Los Angeles auto show, Mini will take the covers off its completely rebuilt Mini Cooper, the mainstay of it...
  • YouTube offers an apology for the rough rollout of its comment system replacement powered by Google+, but it's not going back. November 13, 2013 7:13 PM PST YouTube's new commenting system powered by Google+ is suffering severe birthing pains. (Credit: Google) YouTube channel owners appear to be taking the stance that the Google+ cure is worse than the common YouTube comment. When Google announced that it was going to replace its original commenting system with one powered by Google+, reactions seemed split between a positive reception for improving the level of discourse and giving channel owners more moderation tools, versus the concerns of commenters who felt that their free speech would be infringed. Related stories: Google remains US search king, not surprisingly Google's Project Loon balloons can circle Earth three times Google's Moto G is contract-free NASA re-creates ancient Mars on YouTube Google, HP yank Chromebook 11 from store shelves However, in the aftermath of the Google+ comments rollout, some longtime YouTubers are taking their displeasure with the new system public, posting their videos on YouTube but moving discussions elsewhere on the Web. The complaints from channel owners are multi-faceted: while some are merely annoyed at being forced with their fans to use Google+ more than they had, others such as math video blogger Vi Hart are describing a complicated and messy integration with Google+ that has interfered with the ability of YouTubers to make a living off of their videos -- one of the site's most important draws. The problems also reveal an important flaw in Google+ itself: while the social network was designed to discourage anonymity in the hopes that the use of real names would encourage more respectful behavior online, "there are more than enough people who are willing to be jerks under their real names," said Boing Boing. As a demonstration of how flawed the new comments are, many YouTubers appear to be turning to Reddit as a safe bastion of comments, and are suggesting a Chrome extension to help facilitate the change. The new system is so ineffective that one commenter was allowed to post a comment with the N-word repeated 85 times. When asked about the complaints, Google said to CNET that the company is "working hard" to fix the problems "quickly," including those involving spam and abuse. "We've already made a number of changes in the last 24 hours to reduce spammy comments and bad links, and we have more fixes coming soon." It's not clear yet what kind of brand damage this has done to YouTube, if any, or if it's scared off any of the site's most popular contributors. But it's definitely another poor reception for Google+ that the company didn't need.
    YouTube offers an apology for the rough rollout of its comment system replacement powered by Google+, but it's not going back. November...
  • First, choose Steve Ballmer's replacement for the CEO's hot seat. Then comes the really hard part. Change is coming to Microsoft. What type of change? That is the big question mark. (Credit: Getty Images) During his quieter moments -- assuming they even exist any more -- outgoing Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer might be excused for wondering why the company he has led for the last decade, blessed with enormous wealth and so many smart people, has had to struggle so long and hard for its tech cred. Even if Microsoft's board lucks into hiring someone to replace Ballmer who combines the managerial genius of an Alfred P. Sloan with the formidable intellectual insights of a Peter Drucker, the new boss still inherits a legacy packed with wince-worthy embarrassments, such as Zune and Vista and the stillborn Kin phones. Just as bad, Microsoft is still trying to escape the consequences of its disastrous stumbling about to move beyond the PC. But how many other technology companies have been around this long without a clunker or two (or three)? Remember the Apple Lisa? What about the hockey puck mouse? Feel free to slam Microsoft for its myriad miscues, but let's not forget there's another side of the ledger, including Xbox and Flight Simulator, Windows 95 and Windows XP, Microsoft Exchange Server, and MS Office. Few other tech companies -- not IBM, not Hewlett-Packard and surely not Google -- can boast that breadth of expertise in the consumer and business markets. Unfortunately for Microsoft, trips down memory lane won't be enough to impress the cool kids. Steve Ballmer: Critics notwithstanding, a record of achievement. (Credit: Yoshikazu Tsuno/AFP/Getty Images) The company risks irrelevance -- or worse -- if it can't pilot a successful and rapid course correction. I've explained elsewhere my problems with the better-without-Ballmer scenario, but Wall Street apparently can't wait for the big guy to vacate the premises. Traders have pushed the stock up to six-year highs, reflecting the hope that the next CEO will do for Microsoft what Lou Gerstner did for IBM back in the 1990s. Breaking up is hard to do The conventional wisdom is that a smaller Microsoft translates into a stronger Microsoft, and either of the two most likely CEO candidates could do the honors. Stephen Elop, the former Nokia CEO reportedly on the short list, is apparently open to dumping the Xbox and Bing businesses. That would be a tough decision, but during his three years running Nokia, Elop killed off sacred cows and fired tens of thousands of workers. Stephen Elop: The Microsoft messiah? (Credit: Getty Images) The other apparent top choice, Ford CEO Alan Mulally, also has been an agent of corporate change. He brought Ford back from the brink, closing plants and product lines that did not fit with his vision -- and it paid off. During the throes of the Great Recession, Ford was the only one of the Big Three auto companies that didn't take a government bailout. Before joining Ford, Mulally already was hailed as a corporate star for reviving Boeing, which also had suffered through a long decline. But if a Microsoft bust-up is inevitable, the Gerstner analogy is imprecise, though there are similarities. Let's page back a few years When Lou Gerstner took over as its CEO in 1993, IBM, the dominant tech company of its day, was in trouble. Big trouble. The company was en route to losing $16 billion. Tom Watson's old company was drowning in malaise and confusion. In fact, when Bill Gates showed up for a meeting at Big Blue's New York headquarters, the company's confused security staff inadvertently gave him the security pass reserved for Lotus head Jim Manzi, who was slated to meet with Gerstner later that same day. Maybe this guy? Ford CEO Alan Mulally (Credit: CBS News) "By the time Bill arrived on the 40th floor," Gerstner recalled in his 2002 memoir, "he wasn't happy." Failing to make Gates happy was the least of Gerstner's problems. There was no clear path back to profitability but there also was no shortage of advice. In fact, John Akers, his immediate predecessor, had come up with a blueprint to break IBM into a confederation of 13 so-called "Baby Blues." "If you're going to have a more prosperous business, a faster-growing business, a more exciting business by changing something as opposed to leaving it the way it is, then you ought to change it," Akers told an interviewer. Is Microsoft fixable? On the surface -- no pun intended -- that sounds similar to what some folks now say Microsoft ought to do. Gerstner, however, had different ideas about how to fix IBM. He shelved Akers' plan to break the company into pieces. This was an operational challenge where the big problem was IBM's calcified corporate culture. And Gerstner was ruthless when it came to cost-cutting, firing employees by the tens of thousands. He kept at it until IBM brought expenses and revenues into line. It was ugly but necessary to tame a company bureaucracy that had grown too large. Just as important, Gerstner moved IBM into higher-end services consulting and integration, shedding money-losing businesses along the way. That was a hard choice but it was the right one. By the time Gerstner stepped down in 2002, IBM was again growing and poised for even greater prosperity under his CEO successor, Sam Palmisano, who completed his predecessor's work by selling off IBM's PC business to Lenovo. When the new CEO takes over at Microsoft, a more complicated decision awaits. It isn't as if Redmond needs to sell off its consumer businesses because the company's hemorrhaging money. Just the opposite. In its latest quarter, Microsoft posted $5.2 billion in net income on $18.5 billion in sales. What's needed is a fundamental change in strategy. "That is something that they have to be asking," said Charles Hill, a management professor at the University of Washington. No more game players in the Microsoft of the future? (Credit: James Martin/CNET) That's where the new CEO will earn his or her paycheck. Precisely because Microsoft is not a basket case, this isn't about closing or selling a division or two. Ballmer could have done that years ago and it wouldn't have mattered. The bigger problem is that the company remains very much a prisoner of its past success. Related posts Windows Phone wins bigger chunk of smartphone market Microsoft has already picked its next CEO, claims report Microsoft experiments with fuel cell-powered data center IE gets a new boss: Windows Phone's Joe Belfiore Microsoft touts 'epic' Xbox One launch on November 22 In the Windows-centric era of the 1980s and 1990s, Microsoft's operating systems monopoly was the equivalent of a license to print money. But the emergence of the modern Internet in the mid-1990s caught Microsoft off-guard. This was a pivotal point in the company's history. The Internet represented huge opportunity as well as a threat to Windows and the idea that computing devices needed to run on a proprietary operating system. Management scrambled to react to what Bill Gates famously called the Internet tidal wave. Microsoft responded aggressively -- too aggressively, as it kneecapped Netscape and ultimately wound up getting sued by the Justice Department for antitrust violations. Some contend that this was the event that knocked Microsoft off its game. The argument there is that the lawsuit distracted the company from recognizing a shift in the technology landscape, increasingly populated by Internet-based startups such as Google, Salesforce.com and Facebook. But that's only part of the story. Equally important was Microsoft's determination to protect Windows even as the Internet gained popularity as a commerce and communications platform. There were extended, passionate debates, but ultimately Microsoft refused to break with its past and adopt a more Internet-centric future. "Woulda coulda shoulda but didn't ya," a former Microsoft executive said recalling the arguments. "Ultimately it was Bill's decision. When you're king of the hill, you are driven to play defense and protect." Rattling off the names of Microsoft muckymucks of yesteryear, the former exec continued: "Jim Allchin, Nathan Myhrvold, etc. -- they all played to Bill's desire to control it all forever. Paul Maritz tried to play mediator but in the end the reactionary forces won the battle but caused Microsoft to lose the war." None of this is news to Microsoft's board, but does it have the courage to hire someone with a mandate to kill sacred cows? We'll soon learn the answer. Still, if the next Microsoft CEO doesn't receive a mandate to enact real change, Ballmer's replacement will be little more than a steward, milking a profitable, declining company easing into middle age.
    First, choose Steve Ballmer's replacement for the CEO's hot seat. Then comes the really hard part. Change is coming to Microsoft. Wh...
  • A Korean publication says the next generation Galaxy flagship running Android KitKat could launch shy of the S4's first birthday. November 29, 2013 10:18 PM PST The Galaxy S4 and S3 could have a new sibling sooner than later. (Credit: Josh Miller/CNET) The latest round of rumors has the presumed successor to Samsung's Galaxy S4, a more powerful Galaxy S5, sporting unicorn-esque specs, perhaps some new flexible materials, and craziest of all: Launching as little as ten months after the Galaxy S4 was introduced. A Korean site reports that "industry sources" say production of the Galaxy S5 could begin in January with Samsung's next flagship phone shipping with Android KitKat and alongside a revamped Galaxy Gear 2 watch as early as February or March. That would be a few months ahead of many early-adopting Galaxy S4 owners' one-year anniversaries with their devices. While this sounds like wishful thinking on the part of some overzealous reporter and a who-knows-how-well-infomed supply chain source, it's also not a crazy plan for the likes of Samsung. The Korean monolith has the ability to make just about anything on a massive scale as quickly as it likes and likely has no qualms with cannibalizing sales of its zillions of other smartphone models, including the Galaxy S4. But more importantly, what kind of unicorn is Samsung's S5 team designing this time around? The same report claims the phone could be available in a plastic case or a more premium model with a metal body, and will come loaded with some serious digital beef -- a 64-bit processor, 3 GB of RAM, a 16 megapixel camera and a huge 4,000 mAh battery to power a 5-inch flexible display that could jam as many as 560 pixels into each inch of screen real estate. Samsung had no immediate response to a request for comment, but certainly many Galaxy S4 owners won't be as speechless when the flagship phone they proudly brought home this year is eclipsed in less than the time it takes us all to make a single trip around the sun. What do you think? Is it too soon for a new Samsung flagship or never soon enough? Let us know in the comments below or on Twitter @crave and @ericcmack.
    A Korean publication says the next generation Galaxy flagship running Android KitKat could launch shy of the S4's first birthday. Novem...
  • We took a MINI to the Col de Turini to recreate Paddy Hopkirk's 1964 Monte Carlo rally victory. by MotorPunk November 27, 2013 11:00 AM PST Following in the footsteps of Paddy Hopkirk and the 1964 Monte Carlo Rally This is the story of the ultimate underdog victory; Paddy Hopkirk's win in the 1964 Monte Carlo Rally in a Mini Cooper S. The original Monte Carlo rally was essentially a long-distance reliability trial with some special stages thrown in. We chaps at MotorPunk Magazine resisted the temptation to drag our own classic Mini across the continent and went on another mental rental adventure. We flew down to Nice and collected a MINI (caps lock=BMW Mini) from Hertz. From there we wound our way up into the mountains of the Mercantour national park to re-trace the final stages of the famous '64 rally. The Col de Turini stage is particularly entertaining, switchbacks and short straights climbing up the hillsides to a summit of 1600m. That's a mile high. Back in Paddy's day the road was covered in snow and the Mini's lightness was an advantage as the car would brake later and harder than it's heavier opponents. The Ford Falcon was a favourite to win, driven by Bosse Ljungfeldt it packed a whopping V8 but didn't handle the twisty bits like the little Mini. Another favourite was the Saab 96 piloted by Erik Carlsson, nicknamed 'on the roof' thanks to a sometimes over-enthusiastic driving style. The Mini pulled out a decent lead in the mountains back in '64 but our MINI was hampered by an automatic gearbox and a driver, me, a long way short of Hopkirk's ability. These are beautiful roads to drive though and a lack of horsepower only makes you appreciate the rest of the package even more. Up here it's about grip, braking and handling, things both the Mini and the MINI excel at. The final stage of the original rally was a sprint around the streets of Monaco, essentially the same route as today's GP circuit. There was little hope of us setting any records in our MINI as we competed for road space with Supercars, mopeds and the Monaco sightseeing bus stuffed with gawping tourists. As we now know Hopkirk held off a late challenge from the Falcon for a famous win and was presented with a trophy outside the Palace. We were presented with a lecture about our driving from the local Gendarmes. Nothing handles like a rental.
    We took a MINI to the Col de Turini to recreate Paddy Hopkirk's 1964 Monte Carlo rally victory. by MotorPunk November 27, 2013 11:00 AM...
  • CNET talks to Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside about his hopes for Moto G, and why the Moto X is like a Corvette. Moto G makes its debut in the US. (Credit: CNET) Motorola Mobility apparently couldn't wait for its low-cost Moto G to hit the States. The Moto G went on sale in the US on Tuesday, available only in the GSM variant and unlocked on Motorola.com for $179 without a contract. Related stories The not-so-easy pieces of modular smartphones Battle of the Benjamins: Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini vs. Droid Mini, HTC One Mini, iPhone 5C Take a Moto X, please: Amazon drops price to a penny Motorola expands horizon for Android 4.4 updates Verizon first in line for Moto X's KitKat update The surprise launch comes well ahead of the company's previously planned target of getting the Moto G out in the US by January. Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside told CNET that early demand for the phone has been strong overseas. The company was able to ramp up the manufacturing process faster than anticipated, and it was able to get the Web site up faster, allowing for the early release of the phone. By launching now, Motorola also takes advantage of the holiday shopping season. That doesn't take away from its plans for the first quarter. Motorola's carrier and retail partners will launch the Moto G in January, just in time to take advantage of the traditionally strong prepaid market early in the year. While Verizon Wireless has committed to selling the Moto G for its prepaid brand, Woodside said the LTE-less phone would get "broad distribution" with multiple partners. (He declined to name names.) "We were always gearing up for a big first quarter, but we think we'll have success this quarter as well," Woodside said. Moto G is the low-cost brother to the more ambitious Moto X, which is primarily sold in the US and stands out because customers can tweak how the device looks with different colors and accents. The Moto G, however, could end up selling better because it already has a broad array of partners around the world, and the phone's price tag is attractive given the quality of the device. The flagship Moto X smartphone. (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Woodside declined to comment on sales volume of the Moto X, but he did note the challenges that come from building a brand from scratch. "It's like launching the Corvette for the first time," he said. "It takes a little while for people to know what the Corvette stands for and to decide if it's right for them." Regardless of the sales, Woodside understands that positioning the Moto X for success is a long game. He said the Moto Maker capability has helped spur interest in the device, and noted that nearly 1 million people visited Motorola's Web site to tinker with the customization tool. Even if that interest doesn't translate into immediate sales, it does build awareness. He said anyone hardly visited the Motorola site before Google took it over. Neither the Moto G nor Moto X are sold in China, a result of the Chinese government's ban on Google services, which flow into its phones. Woodside wouldn't close the door on Motorola phones making a comeback in China -- they previously had a strong position in the market, and the brand still holds some sway there -- but he said there were no plans to pursue that region. As for the future of the Moto X franchise, he said the next step in customization will be the color, finish, and material of the phones. Ultimately, he would like to offer consumers the ability to choose their own screen size, processor speed, and memory, but he said there are a lot of complications and a lack of standards to make it all work. The company is only beginning to create those standards now. Motorola's Project Ara is the company's push to get to that ultimate goal, but Woodside's comments suggest that's still a long way off. Motorola Moto G, a quad-core smartphone for $179 unlocked (pictures) 1-2 of 17 Scroll Left Scroll Right As for more immediate possibilities, Woodside talked about tablets, noting that "it is always something we're looking at," but said that the company wouldn't put out a product unless it could put a different spin on it. "There's some exploration, but nothing we can talk about right now," he said. Lastly, Woodside weighed in on the possibility of Motorola creating a Nexus phone. He is open to working with his parent company's Android team, and doesn't believe it crosses a line for Motorola to participate. But for now, it doesn't appear as if Motorola is in the running for a Nexus device. "That's something that's more a conversation for (Android, Chrome, and Google apps chief Sundar Pichai)," he said. Read the CNET Editors' Take Motorola Moto G Editors' Take: Motorola has taken the wraps off its latest smartphone, the Moto G. The device features a 720p, 4.5-inch screen and Android 4.3 Jelly Bean. Read More
    CNET talks to Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside about his hopes for Moto G, and why the Moto X is like a Corvette. Moto G makes its debut in the ...
  • Xbox One is the loneliest number if you're trying to shoehorn its do-it-all TV proposition into a family room...unless you're willing to be part of the experiment. (Credit: Scott Stein/CNET) My Xbox One may not stay connected to my cable box very long. In a year's time, the Xbox One might be the ultimate TV-connected entertainment box on the planet. But at the moment, it's sitting awkwardly between my cable DVR and my TV -- where it's causing some tension among the TV viewers in my household. There are a lot of good ideas lurking within the potential of what Microsoft's newest Xbox can be. A smart home hub; an entertainment do-everything machine. But they're mixed with unfortunate downsides: and, at the moment, from what I can see, the Xbox One is a console best appreciated by those who want to absorb entertainment by themselves. As a system for sharing (with someone in the same room, not somewhere online), the PlayStation 4 and Wii U do a better job at being both innocuous and second-screen-friendly. That's partially because they're not trying as hard to do something new...but it's also because they're systems that keep TV and gaming as largely separate entities. Let me explain. (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Hooking up the Xbox One at home: a home-entertainment imposition It's a lot to ask my wife to accept on the only TV in my apartment: hi, do you mind if I run our cable box through this Xbox? It'll only take a few minutes. It won't inconvenience you much. "Family acceptance" is the rule I have to live by, having two kids and a small place. Others -- those enjoying a solo gaming and entertainment experience in massive man-caves -- might enjoy having the Xbox One as a fantasy-box, a connect-it-all big-kid toy. All I know right now is that my wife is asking, "why do we have to do this?" The short answer: because I'm writing an article, and wanted to experiment, and I work at CNET. But the long answer, well, that's hard. I try to explain the Xbox One's upsides, really, I do. I show her voice commands, how I can say "Xbox, watch ESPN" and it does it, and how all the channel listings are nicely laid out. All my wife sees is a big black box sitting between the cable box and the TV that she has to turn on. A universal remote like a Harmony could help knit this all together better, and maybe Harmony is what an Xbox One owner really needs (the remote, and the concept). Before, I could turn on the TV and cable with one Verizon-supplied and admittedly lousy remote. Now, I need to either say "Xbox, turn on," which doesn't always work, or find the Xbox One controller, which I need anyway to navigate the Xbox menus without yelling. And the cable remote, well, I need that, still, because the Xbox doesn't have its own remote -- unless you pair a phone or tablet with the SmartGlass app -- and that's my only way to access the cable box DVR. (Credit: Scott Stein/CNET) And even if you use the admittedly pretty cool SmartGlass app, you still need a phone or tablet nearby, ready and connected. Using voice commands on the Xbox One means talking loudly and repeatedly, using specific commands I didn't always remember specifically. Meanwhile, I have a nine-month old baby sleeping in one room and a five-year-old in the other. I'm getting elbowed to please keep quiet. I reach for the remote again. I'll cast aside the fact that she also said she noticed the TV signal looked different -- paler, more washed out. CNET didn't find an issue with the XBox One throughput, but -- whether it's a placebo effect or not -- I see a slight difference. The real problem here is that the Xbox One doesn't do anything magical with TV: its just allows pass-through, and split-screen app-viewing and gameplay. (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) I tried demonstrating the Xbox One's clean TV-listing interface, the ability to search for shows across streaming services, to pause live TV with a simple voice command. It didn't win over my harshest tech critic. And meanwhile, that massive new Kinect sat below our TV, staring at us. It doesn't whirr and move like the last Kinect, but it's ever-present. I haven't gotten many complaints about it yet, but maybe that's because I've had a Kinect under my TV for at least a year before that. (Credit: Scott Stein/CNET) Smart TV? Not really, not yet What can Xbox One do for my TV viewing, I ask again? Not all that much at all. I don't use "snap" split-screen much at all, even with a 59-inch TV. Audio from the TV channel and the Xbox game either gets mixed or can't be heard at all sometimes, and it gets too confusing. Also, the apps for that split-screen just aren't great. I tried watching the Jets-Ravens game with the NFL app snapped to the right, and expected -- or hoped for -- greatness. All I really got, mostly, as a score/stat rundown that matched what my phone could already give me...and was slower to update for some reason. I couldn't say "Xbox, show me passing stats," or "Xbox, replay third down," or "Xbox, show game schedule." I wanted the NFL app to be my virtual man-in-the-booth, feeding me relevant stats and interesting analysis as the game kept going on. It's just not that smart yet. If the Xbox One could eventually do that, great: but, split-screening just doesn't do all that much all that well right now. The Wii U has off-TV play, unlike the Xbox One. (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) Hey you, get off my TV Now, because we only have one TV, there's also a lot of screen-sharing. I watch my shows, she watches hers, the kids watch theirs -- or I play games, and we strike a balance. The Wii U and PlayStation 4 both have a brilliant second-screen proposition to ease the pain, if you have the gear. Nintendo's console comes with a Game Pad that plays many games on a second screen very easily. The PS Vita, PS4, and remote play: works well, too. (Credit: Sally Nieman/CNET) On the PS4, if you have a PlayStation Vita, it's possible to connect to Remote Play to stream games in much the same way, and it works pretty impressively. This is second screen potential at its finest, because it frees up the TV for others -- while you're still playing a console game in your hands. The Xbox One has second screen capabilities via its SmartGlass phone and tablet app, but it's a different story altogether. SmartGlass is a huge help as a remote for video playback, and can be used in some games and video content, but it can't currently play games while someone else watches TV. I don't see why that can't happen in the future, but you'd need to figure out button controls, too. (Credit: Scott Stein/CNET) Another small problem happens when the Xbox One occasionally pings messages in the middle of a show someone else is watching, or someone's voice accidentally brings up a video-control menu or even changes the channel. Those moments are rare, but any additional annoyances add additional straw to the camel back of "why am I subjecting my family to this, again?" If everyone isn't quiet while watching on the Xbox, something odd is bound to happen sooner or later via an unexpected voice command. Hey you, get off my Xbox There's another problem with TV pass-through: suddenly, my wife's using my Xbox One all the time just to watch TV. Does that sound selfish? Well, it is, in a sense: I think of game consoles as personal devices. (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) I haven't made a user ID for my wife to log in as, and maybe that would help things. But she's getting inconvenienced by having to root around for the controller, and clicking on the "TV" icon, or not having the Kinect understand her voice. And sometimes she forgets to turn the Xbox One off, which is understandable -- it's one more box. And no, saying, "Xbox, turn off" isn't exactly intuitive yet to the average person, even if it's easy to do. I do love how the Xbox One seamlessly and impressively auto-identifies you and logs you into a particular profile, which could mean a "family-friendly" mode in the future for when my kid or wife uses the machine, but right now user accounts are useless to me. This isn't an Android tablet or an iCloud account. My family doesn't have different Xbox profiles, nor do they seem to care to. If I was visiting a friend, I could log in as myself, and that's great, but that doesn't do much for my home. Xbox and the man-cave: good if you're Ray Lewis Look at one of the latest Xbox One commercials, featuring smack-talking NFL legends. Ray Lewis looks like he's strapped into a heads-up display in a personal virtual bubble: TV, friends, gaming, all at his command. He's in his own media cave. How does someone else share that cave? The answer right now is you're not really meant to. The Xbox One seems best for one controller, one user, one online experience, one voice to command all its elements into place. It's personal technology spread across a big screen. (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET) After the first day: tired acceptance Eventually, I wasn't asked to disconnect the Xbox One. Inertia had won the day. But I can't keep expecting my wife to keep hunting for the Xbox controller. This experiment, for now, is just an experiment. I'll switch back, because this current set-up just doesn't make any sense. HDMI-in on the Xbox One is like that extra port on a laptop you don't need now but you could in the future. Microsoft hopes the Xbox One will add more robust DVR control, and deeper cable access, down the road. How soon, or how easy that is to enable, I have no idea. But I'm tempted to just yank the cable box out of the Xbox One until that day arrives. I still think the Xbox One is the most advanced gaming console of this new generation, but to someone trying to sneak one into a living room, ironically, its "living room-friendly" elements make it the hardest to accept. And apologies to my wife, who's the unwitting subject of this article. Believe me, she likes new ideas and new technologies...when they make life better. And I don't think she's alone.
    Xbox One is the loneliest number if you're trying to shoehorn its do-it-all TV proposition into a family room...unless you're willin...

Categories

  • ANDROID
  • APPLE
  • BADA
  • BLACKBERRY
  • DIGITAL CAMERAS
  • Fablet
  • GALLERIES
  • JAVA
  • LAPTOPS
  • MOBILE PHONES
  • MOBILE PLATFORM
  • MP3 PLAYERS
  • NEWS
  • PORTABLE STORAGE
  • REVIEWS
  • SMART GADGETS
  • SYMBIAN
  • TABLET
  • WINDOWS

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (548)
    • ▼  November (500)
      • A Korean publication says the next generation Gala...
      • Unexplained technical issues caused the rocket lau...
      • The tech giant and its court-appointed antitrust m...
      • Just in time for Black Friday, the low-cost siblin...
      • The e-commerce giant doesn't seem too worried abou...
      • Noticed an especially full photo feed on Thanksgiv...
      • The Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 4, and Nexus 5 can be forc...
      • For just one week, Google is offering shoppers cre...
      • The Southeast Asian nation is serving up harsh pen...
      • The sun-grazing comet spent Thanksgiving visiting ...
      • Black Friday offers now abound across the world. E...
      • In an unusual twist that goes against its traditio...
      • In an unusual twist that goes against its traditio...
      • Somehow, the early beginning to Black Friday shopp...
      • For online shopping, smartphones are good for brow...
      • Dive into four new books that use Legos to depict ...
      • The chip giant has been working on "perceptual com...
      • A Google Glass developer with a clear vision of wh...
      • Four new books showcase some of the most important...
      • James Howells' digital currency worth hardly nothi...
      • Looking for the ultimate Black Friday deal? Pump u...
      • The deals are coming in hot and heavy, so check ba...
      • Web giant's practice of combining user data from i...
      • A Ukrainian startup launches an online service tha...
      • Judge Lucy Koh finds that plaintiffs failed to pro...
      • Another enchanting doodle from the Google factory ...
      • Towering over the Forth and Clyde canal, The Kelpi...
      • The tech giant doesn't object to the variant of th...
      • A Ukrainian startup launches an online service tha...
      • The Spanish company's new Firefox OS phone will in...
      • Indulge your inner Hobbit with the "Journey throug...
      • Google doesn't object to the variant of the open-s...
      • YouTube looks set to introduce an ad-free subscrip...
      • New reports suggest Ford's Alan Mulally and Micros...
      • What better appetizer for your Thanksgiving feast ...
      • New reports suggest Ford's Alan Mulally and Micros...
      • Why is CNET's Roger Cheng so grateful for Samsung'...
      • One of the major holiday challenges is what to giv...
      • With a shortened shopping season, many big-box ret...
      • Next spring, Fabien Cousteau, grandson of the lege...
      • The biggest shopping day of the year is gearing up...
      • Three hand-picked Android apps can help you scope ...
      • With a shortened shopping season, many big box ret...
      • One of the major holiday challenges is what to giv...
      • The 16-foot-long model is powered by four small tu...
      • Budweiser UK launches a publicity campaign around ...
      • A Seattle restaurant, the latest to ban Google Gla...
      • Spectators won't believe their eyes when you make ...
      • Many hard drives come preformatted with special ut...
      • NASA releases a short movie showing comet ISON's a...
      • Discarded holiday wrapping paper can get pretty in...
      • We took a MINI to the Col de Turini to recreate Pa...
      • An ESPN survey suggests that while women do more s...
      • The increasingly popular currency was worth about ...
      • A UK study sees a first-ever drop in sexual activi...
      • The company has created a patent-pending technolog...
      • The number of affected customers was exceedingly s...
      • Koss' budget-friendly on-ear headphone doesn't loo...
      • Batch-made plastic eyes could be much cheaper than...
      • Apple is reportedly interested in improving its ma...
      • The flash memory technology is inexpensive and ubi...
      • Several retailers have published deals exclusively...
      • The update to Nokia's popular budget smartphone ma...
      • Apple increased its orders of iPad Minis in Novemb...
      • Tablets, tablets, and more tablets, as stores slas...
      • Batch-made plastic eyes could be much cheaper than...
      • The targets' appetite for sexually explicit materi...
      • Apple has reportedly ramped up iPad Mini supply to...
      • Nokia says it's the "right tablet," touting the it...
      • An update to Nokia's popular budget smartphone mak...
      • Two new browsers have followed Firefox with suppor...
      • Muslim radicals' appetite for sexual explicit mate...
      • If Microsoft's outgoing chief executive had listen...
      • Edward Snowden's NSA leaks have caused Google, Yah...
      • Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman believes tablet-la...
      • Black versions of the Android compatible smartwatc...
      • This magnetic device lets you act like a creepy sp...
      • So what are the real deals this Black Friday? Chec...
      • Apple's tablet is, according to Microsoft, no good...
      • In-ear vs. on-ear, circumaural vs. supraaural, ope...
      • On Tuesday Google announced a new extension for Ch...
      • The NSA may have employed an old-school spy techni...
      • Fly the friendly skies with a hot-rod paper airpla...
      • The company's new C720P Chromebook, due out next m...
      • Xbox One is the loneliest number if you're trying ...
      • On today's show, we'll tell you about the battle b...
      • New Zealand design engineer Olaf Diegel has 3D-pri...
      • If you read the fine print on the Xbox One, nearly...
      • The new caching of preference settings in OS X Mav...
      • Whether you're running the kitchen on the big day ...
      • Keep your sanity in the kitchen this holiday seaso...
      • The Redmond, Wash., company's latest anti-Google a...
      • When you want to communicate a subtle sense of dre...
      • The platform is rolling out on Tuesday to those ru...
      • Boomf lets your feast on your artfully filtered In...
      • November 26, 2013 8:42 AM PST LG's Splendor is on...
      • The platform is rolling out on Tuesday to those ru...
      • San Antonio's BiblioTech, believed to be the first...
      • A leak on Twitter reveals what appears to be the t...
      • Lower prices are the main catalyst for the surge i...
      • Amazon is all decked out sell you discounted Teena...
      • The new YouTube comment system opened the door to ...
      • Which component in the new console costs the most?...
      • Developers can now purchase a Google Glass to get ...
      • CNET talks to Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside about h...
      • Not everybody likes Google's JavaScript competitor...
      • The company will offer discounted rates on some of...
      • Biel Crystal Manufactory -- which counts Apple, Sa...
      • Apple and Samsung will lead the charge but may fac...
      • When the open-source hardware makers at Adafruit b...
      • Cars are getting smarter, but they're also getting...
      • Korean electronics giant sought halt to proceeding...
      • Market researcher Forrester estimates that an all-...
      • China's official state news agency reports that th...
      • Apple partners with GN ReSound to create LiNX -- a...
      • Microsoft is responding to the "very small" subset...
      • Apple's Spotlight search offers some quick navigat...
      • The Anova Sous Vide Immersion Circulator is an eas...
      • In a new ad for the Nokia Lumia 2520, a man wonder...
      • 23andMe continues to sell its genetic sequencing t...
      • Chip giant planned a subscription service to deliv...
      • Word has it that the Chinese smartphone maker is p...
      • A team at the National University of Singapore has...
      • The TV anchor's move to Yahoo is part of a larger ...
      • The newcomer MVNO adds its most advanced phone yet...
      • As we move into Black Friday week, let us all keep...
      • UrtheCast is poised to offer free, near-real-time ...
      • A Microsoft official confirms the company is plann...
    • ►  April (48)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile